Since my entrance into the Catholic Church I have spent my days and evenings reading the Canon (laws of the Church), the Rubrics, and documents of the Church. I have many more to read and understand, but one thing has been pretty clear, what should be done in Mass and what should not be done.
There is a posture taken by Priest called the Orans Posture in which they place their hands out and up when praying singularly for the Congregation.
Orans Posture
In reading the rubrics prior to 1950, this was a position that only Priest were to take that were celebrating or con-celebrating when they were praying on behalf of the Congregation, and while the Congregation was silent. The rubrics stated that the hands of a Priest, when praying WITH the Congregation were to be together “in a prayerful manner”.
If you read the rubrics now, it still has the Priest in this position when praying on behalf of the the congregation and people of the world, but continues to have the Priest take this posture when praying the “Our Father”, which now shows the Congregation praying, where before they did not pray with the Priest during Mass. The Deacon, if present is still to be in the “prayerful manner”, which was described in the past as hands together, fingers extended and thumbs cross or fingers interlaced and crossed. (The Deacon or non-concelibrating but present Priest were not to take the Orans Posture…)
In the late 60s to early 70s the Charismatic groups and Nuns in the United States started holding hands with the advent of the text from Vatican II. There was never a proclamation to do so, and there was no rubrics changes published by the Church to do so, they just started to do it to show togetherness.
However if you go back in history, the only time we see this posture being taken was when a LEADER/ELDER/PRIEST was praying for the people, it was never a posture taken by the lay or religious people unless they were the ones leading the prayer and praying on behalf of the people present.
It was a practice to hold hands at the dinner table when praying, but never was it so while in Church or at a Religious service!
We need to go away from the attempt to become like the Ordained and return to our roots in this case. Don’t get me wrong!
I am all for change when change needs to happen, but this is not a change that makes since or needs to happen. It is taking our actions to us and away from God and our love and need to be with Him and returning our focus on ourselves and not Him!
In Christ
Related Posts
- 21Back at the end of October of 2020, I moved to a new Dioceses and a new Church. Bought a house to live in for the rest of my life, barring any changes in that area. There is a Catholic Church 9/10ths of a mile from my house! The Pastor…
- 17When I got home, I looked up the Order, which had been "raised" about 9 or so years earlier. It was small, and consisted of Lay Brothers and Sisters and was newly starting to have Religious Brothers. All lived withing the vows of Poverty, Obedience, and Chastity to Station in…
- 16After a LONG, too LONG, sabbatical, I am returning to posting the Daily Readings on this page. These "readings" are the daily reading of the Bible as practiced by the Catholic Church. If you go to Church every day of the week, all year, you are taught the majority of…
- 16During Mass, and after the Readings and Homily of the day, we have the citing of all of the Nicene Creed. Next comes what is called the Prayer of the Faithful. This consist of a series of prayer, typically four to five such prayers with a closing of each by…
- 15Sunday is a Holy Day of Obligation in the Catholic Church. What this means is you are "required" as part of being Catholic to go to Church every Sunday and "keep it Holy" by dedicating the day to the Lord. Here in the US, because many people started taking jobs…
Vatican II has a lot to answer for. One of my older students tell me she thinks that mass should still be in Latin, after all these years.
Anji recently posted…In competition with myself
Yes and no Anji!
Vatican II if properly read and understood was actually pretty well done and the path it should have set would have been great. The problem lies in the MISINTERPRETATION of what came out of the Council.
As to keeping the Mass in Latin, I’m not sure I agree there. I think the FORM of Mass then should be returned to, but that the language should remain in the vernacular of the region.
I could be OK with it returning to Latin, provided that EVERYONE learns Latin, but very much feel that the language be understandable by those that are present. And our Mass was not originally in Latin, but in Greek, so saying that is what it started in doesn’t work for me. When Latin started as the language, it was the main language of the time being used by the majority of the Church going populace in the larger areas of the Church. Even initially the language of use was in the vernacular of the region, not Latin necessarily!
Brother Don Bell recently posted…Orans Posture